<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Search And Bookmarking With Sproose</title>
	<link>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/</link>
	<description>analog ideas in a digital world</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: listikal</title>
		<link>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1572</link>
		<author>listikal</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1572</guid>
					<description>I like how they are trying to do something original here, but this just isn't going to fly long term.  They really needed a database of searches already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how they are trying to do something original here, but this just isn&#8217;t going to fly long term.  They really needed a database of searches already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1573</link>
		<author>Wayne Smallman</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1573</guid>
					<description>If I had more time, I'd have written a similar web application myself.

It's the next logical step, so it's got that it's-about-damn-time thing about it.

When stuff is voted on, it inherits trust, and trust as a currency is incredibly difficult to beat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had more time, I&#8217;d have written a similar web application myself.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the next logical step, so it&#8217;s got that it&#8217;s-about-damn-time thing about it.</p>
<p>When stuff is voted on, it inherits trust, and trust as a currency is incredibly difficult to beat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madhur Kapoor</title>
		<link>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1579</link>
		<author>Madhur Kapoor</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 19:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1579</guid>
					<description>The idea seems good but as you suggested , it can fail due to irrelevant results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea seems good but as you suggested , it can fail due to irrelevant results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristofer</title>
		<link>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1587</link>
		<author>kristofer</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 01:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1587</guid>
					<description>It kinda looks like digg as well as sounding like it, dunno but i think we have enough search engines out there already..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It kinda looks like digg as well as sounding like it, dunno but i think we have enough search engines out there already..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brown Baron</title>
		<link>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1589</link>
		<author>Brown Baron</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1589</guid>
					<description>If they could make sure that the results would always be relevant, then the voting would be an interesting addition to the search concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they could make sure that the results would always be relevant, then the voting would be an interesting addition to the search concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1595</link>
		<author>Mark</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 04:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1595</guid>
					<description>I don't know -- another search engine? And one that you have to vote on to get somewhere? Too much potential to gaming the system just like digg. Interesting concept, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know &#8212; another search engine? And one that you have to vote on to get somewhere? Too much potential to gaming the system just like digg. Interesting concept, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1597</link>
		<author>Wayne Smallman</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 05:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1597</guid>
					<description>The way that I read it at first glance, was that Sproose aggregates search results from the likes of Digg, del.icio.us, Reddit, StumbleUpon et cetera.

That would be far more exciting, and much more meaningful than what they're currently hoping to achieve.

And, it would be much more difficult to game if that was the case...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way that I read it at first glance, was that Sproose aggregates search results from the likes of Digg, del.icio.us, Reddit, StumbleUpon et cetera.</p>
<p>That would be far more exciting, and much more meaningful than what they&#8217;re currently hoping to achieve.</p>
<p>And, it would be much more difficult to game if that was the case&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brown Baron</title>
		<link>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1599</link>
		<author>Brown Baron</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1599</guid>
					<description>If the results were aggregated then it would be difficult to game. I hope they can pull it off .. the concept sounds real good on paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the results were aggregated then it would be difficult to game. I hope they can pull it off .. the concept sounds real good on paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: listikal</title>
		<link>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1603</link>
		<author>listikal</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1603</guid>
					<description>Speaking of Digg and searching...It sucks.  Anybody disagree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Digg and searching&#8230;It sucks.  Anybody disagree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush Mackel</title>
		<link>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1606</link>
		<author>Bush Mackel</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-1606</guid>
					<description>@ Listikal - Not I. (#):D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Listikal - Not I. (#):D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search to get a social Sproose up?</title>
		<link>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-12999</link>
		<author>Search to get a social Sproose up?</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 04:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brownbaron.com/blog/2007/06/06/social-search-and-bookmarking-with-sproose/#comment-12999</guid>
					<description>[...] I happened upon Sproose, the user-powered search engine while rummaging through Ariel&#8217;s &#8216;blog, who&#8217;s more commonly known as The Brown Baron. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I happened upon Sproose, the user-powered search engine while rummaging through Ariel&#8217;s &#8216;blog, who&#8217;s more commonly known as The Brown Baron. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.003 seconds -->
